Poetry and the Police (Intro-Ch.9 skip Ch. 6-7; pp. 1-65 skip 37-44); do look at footnotes
To guide your reading:
Darnton begins with the “detective work” (both by the French police in 1749 and by modern historians) of the “Affair of the Fourteen” and then tries to “dig deeper” (or maybe “zoom bigger”?) by considering underlying issues. The point is that establishing the facts of what happened are only the very beginning of doing history. Layers to consider:
What does Darnton say is the “big question” or overall purpose of his book? (Intro, but especially Ch. 2 and 4).
What does Darnton argue about the social and intellectual networks revealed by the investigation of the poems? He begins with the bourgeois (Ch. 3 and 4).
He then explores the connection between the poems in the investigation and the nobility (Ch. 4 and 5).
Chapter 6 in one sentence: the Fourteen had their careers wrecked; some went into exile; one had trouble finding a wife later because of it, and “they probably never comprehended what ‘the affair’ was all about.
Chapter 7: if the poems are only a product of court politics, then they are not really a reflection of “public opinion”; but by 1749 Louis XV and his officials did care about what “people are saying” and carefully monitored it, even shaping their policies sometimes.
What were the “current events” affecting public opinion in 1749 (Ch. 8) and how were those expressed in poems (Ch. 9)? Consider the different variations, messages, or types of poems.
Throughout this book, try to notice Darnton’s decisions and paths as a fellow historian. This book is sort of a glorified primary source explanation like your research project! How does he move from a particular set of primary sources to other primary sources, secondary sources, asking new questions, larger questions, etc. You can also try to notice when he makes unconvincing arguments, asks a question and then fails to answer it, etc. (which he does do!).